FROM FAX SPAMMERS?

Why not make some Cash Money??

If you believe that you have received an unsolicited junk fax, we would like to hear from you. Contact us today by filling out the short form below and let us review your claim. You may be eligible for compensation under the law from $500 to $1500 per unsolicited fax.

Please Report Your Unwanted Junk Fax Spam & Get Paid Cash For Every Unsolicited Fax You Receive!

WE MAY BE ABLE TO HELP YOU STOP JUNK FAXES
AND PAY YOU CASH IF WE FIND YOUR SPAMMER!

Let's Stop The Fax Spammers In Their Tracks!

To Report An Unsolicited Junk Fax
Please Fill Out The Form Below

We will investigate your fax spam report at no charge to you and 
we will work to track down your fax spammer right away.

If we track down your fax spammer, we?ll contact you ASAP and help you collect CASH MONEY!

Get $500 - $1500 FOR EVERY JUNK FAX YOU RECEIVE!!!

Claim in suit for $5,000 remedy against

E-Babylon Inc.

Facts of Case:

Ten unsolicited junk faxes from inkjets2toner.com were sent to me via my home fax machine without my express written or verbal consent.

Supporting Law in defense of Plaintiff:

1.        Unsolicited faxes are illegal under USC, Title 47, Section 227(b)(1)(C): “It shall be unlawful for any person within the United States to use any telephone facsimile machine, computer, or other device to send an unsolicited advertisement to a telephone facsimile machine;…”

2.        The term “unsolicited advertisement” is defined in USC, Title 47, Section 227(a)(4):

“ The term “unsolicited advertisement” means any material advertising the commercial availability or quality of any property, goods, or services which is transmitted to any person without that person’s prior express invitation or permission.”

3.        There is a private right of action allowed for under USC, Title 47, Section 227(b)(3)(A): “A person or entity may, if otherwise permitted by the laws or rules of court of a state, bring in an appropriate court of that state”  

4.        The constitutionality of the TCPA was upheld by The United States Court of Appeals For The Ninth Circuit Court. Cite Destination Ventures, Ltd. Vs. FCC, 46 F.3d 54 (9^th Cir. 1995). “Therefore, we hold that the ban on unsolicited fax advertisements meets the Central Hudson and Fox test for restrictions on commercial speech.”

5.        Superior Court of California(County of Santa Clara) Los Gatos Small Claims case ruling supports and upholds USC 47, section 227 Cite case #AS02274098( Fenerty Vs. Cedar Mortgage Co.).

6.        The statutory remedy for sending an unsolicited fax is cited in USC 47 , section 227(b)(3)(B)(C). “A person or entity may, if otherwise permitted by laws or rules of court of a state, bring in an appropriate court of that state an action to recover for actual monetary loss from such a violation, or to receive $500 in damages for each such violation, whichever is greater, or both such actions.

7.        If the violator knowingly or willingly sent a fax, then a treble remedy applies, and is supported by USC 47, section 227(b)(3) “If the court finds that the defendant willfully or knowingly violated this subsection or the regulations prescribed under this subsection, the court may, in its discretion, increase the amount of the reward to an amount equal to not more than 3 times the amount available under subparagraph B of this paragraph.”

8.        This court has proper jurisdiction under USC 47,Section 227(b)(3) “ A person or entity may, if otherwise permitted by the laws or rules of court of a state, bring in an appropriate court of that state.”

9.        On July 22, 2003, in Kaufman v. ACS Systems (July 22, 2003, B155804) Cal.App.4th, the California Court of Appeals reversed Superior Court Judge Ann L. Kough's ruling that California is an opt-in state. They ruled that 1)the TCPA applies in California and that enabling legislation is not required, 2) the TCPA is constitutional (already affirmed by the California Supreme Court), and 3) that class actions can be brought in California under the TCPA.

10.   The sender of the fax is considered to be the creator of the content
From http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97117.txt 

      We clarify that the sender of a facsimile message is the creator of the content of the message. We find that the Section 227(d)(1) of the statute mandates that a facsimile include the identification of the business, other entity, or individual creating or originating a facsimile message and not the entity that transmits the message. We do not find anything in the TCPA that would prohibit a facsimile broadcast provider from supplying identification of itself and the entity originating a message if it arranges with the message sender to do so. This, however, is a matter between the parties, and we emphasize that in cases where parties choose to place dual identification upon the facsimile message, it must be clear which entity is the content originator and which entity is merely the transmitter of the message. Thus, we protect consumers' rights to identify the sender of an unsolicited facsimile message without unduly hindering the business practices of facsimile broadcast service providers.

FAX US ALL Your Junk
FAXES NOW TO OUR FAX NUMBER BELOW:
(754) 264-0166 AND
GET PAID IF WE TRACK
YOUR FAX SPAMMER DOWN!

Background Information About Junk Spam Faxes.

The TCPA and Federal Communications Commission (FCC) rules generally prohibit most unsolicited junk facsimile (fax spam) advertisements. The TCPA states that an advertiser cannot send you unsolicited fax advertisements unless you have given the advertiser your prior express consent to receive fax advertisements or you have an established business relationship (EBR). Even if the advertiser has received your prior express consent or has EBR, they are also required to allow you to ?opt out? of receiving their junk fax advertisements. The Junk Fax Prevention Act of 2005, directed the FCC to amend its rules adopted pursuant to the TCPA regarding fax advertising. The FCC?s revised rules:

		Require the sender of fax advertisements to provide specific information on the fax that allows recipients to ?opt-out? of any future faxes from the sender
		Specify the circumstances under which a request to ?opt-out? complies with the Act.