TIRED OF RECEIVING
Unsolicited JUNK FAXES
FROM FAX
SPAMMERS?
Why not make some
Cash Money??
If you believe that you have received an unsolicited junk fax, we would like to hear from
you. Contact us today by filling out the short form below and let us review your claim. You may be eligible for compensation under the law from $500 to $1500 per unsolicited fax.
How About
Getting PAID $500 - $1500
FOR EVERY
JUNK FAX YOU RECEIVE? |
Please Report Your Unwanted Junk Fax
Spam & Get Paid Cash For Every Unsolicited
Fax You Receive!
WE MAY BE ABLE
TO HELP YOU STOP JUNK FAXES
AND PAY YOU CASH IF WE FIND
YOUR SPAMMER!
Junk Fax Broadcaster info
Here's how junk faxer fax.com got some of their fax numbers and
did some of their
faxing:
-
faxcaster hardware is loaned to
advertising clients. Clients are supposed to install 4 or more phone lines
and attach it to the computer.
-
The faxcaster computers are generic PCs, with a fax.com faxcaster logo on
the front (a little stick on button). The units are sealed with a security
seal and there is no floppy drive. It is a one IDE drive system (4GB drive)
running Windows NT. The startup of the faxcaster application is automatic
upon reboot.
-
faxcaster app is written in FoxPro. It is a very professional looking
application.
-
faxcaster software alternates between sending out ads on behalf of the
client that is hosting the hardware in his home/office, and war dialing to
discover new fax numbers.
-
faxcaster uses and transmits back to corp HQ newly discovered fax numbers.
-
The fax.com clients have
no clue that war dialing is going on and there is relatively little access to the faxcaster PC.
-
There is a file cdata/castTable.dbf which has 10,000 4 digit suffixes in
pseudo random order. The order is actually carefully controlled to avoid two
extensions of a business tied up at the same time (which would be yet
another TCPA violation). They find a working prefix, say 571-, and then
append the next 4 digit suffix from the castTable to get a number to dial.
This also makes the calling pattern seem more random to someone getting
called, e.g., it minimizes the chance of another "University of
Washington Medical Center" problem where they basically called
sequentially.
-
War-dialing is known as "casting". Sending out unsolicited faxes
is known as "marketing"
-
jobhistory.dbf is the file that has a record of what has been done. The
fax numbers called are all in the fdata directory. They are stored in
encrypted form. Let us know if you need instructions on how to crack the
encryption. It's not hard.
-
adverts directory has the advertising copy that is sent out. cast.txt is a
1 byte file sent if it discovers a fax tone. This avoids the extra legal
risk of sending a "fax.com permission page" (mainfax.tif) which is
also in the directory but not used anymore. Therefore, new fax machine numbers can
be discovered without (seeming to) violate federal law since no fax is
transmitted.
-
They send out about 100 successful faxes per hour, with from 25 to 50 or
so non-connects within that same 1 hour period. War dialing is faster...200
connects per hour with about a 5% yield (i.e., 10 new fax numbers per hour).
-
The PC is setup
by fax.com and controlled by fax.com using Symantec pcANYWHERE.
-
The faxcaster checks in with fax.com mother ship periodically. If the equipment is
disconnected, within 24 hours, fax.com calls the client to reconnect
the equipment .
-
The client pays fax.com several hundred dollars a month to do
this. You heard right... nobody is getting rich on running faxcasters for
fax.com. In other words, in situations where the client is running a
faxcaster, fax.com doesn't have any expense at all in sending out
these junk faxes to you... they client pays fax.com and the client pays for
the phone line; and since all the calls are local, it costs nothing to send
a fax. All the costs are shifted onto the consumer.
-
In short, war dialing for fax numbers, permission never obtained, no
phone numbers supplied by client means they are all sent without express
invitation or consent in direct violation of federal law.
We have lots more information on faxcasters if you are an attorney or state
attorney general, etc. Contact us via e-mail.
Other info
faxcasters create a random list of suffixes and use that to dial numbers to
do casting (war dialing for new numbers).
there is an encrypted database of numbers discovered.
But there is ONE specific log file that has a record of every call. It has
the encrypted number called and whether the call was successful and duration of
the call and which fax was sent to that encrypted number.
Fax.com collects these logfiles periodically so they can know how much to
bill the customer and they disappear off the faxcaster.
The phone number database itself within the faxcaster changes over time.
The information is gathered from the Faxcasters by Telcom Tech Support and
deletions are run through the database and newly discovered numbers are written
to the main fax database. Every number is meticulously kept up with in their SQL
database, which is housed with Eric in Monrovia at Tech Access Systems. There is
a code for where the number came from, when, how many times it has been sent by
Faxcaster, how many times it was sent from Aliso Viejo, how many times it has
been sent from the Super Faxcasters. They keep up with every single thing about
every single number. Ahmed Sadiq is the chief programmer. He is the one that
created the database at Eric's direction. And they back it up all the time, to
tape and to hard drive. Ahmed is just anal that way.
They use a Visual FoxPro addin from Hilco called
CRYPTOR.
It dies field-level encryption.
The Faxcasters run a home-grown app written in Visual FoxPro... which is not
truely compilled, but exists in a tokenized source code form that is interpreted
by the VFP engine when it runs.... you can recover the source code easily with
another product fro Hilco called ReFox. For the CRYPTOR software to work, the
encryption key must be in the source code.
BUT, Hilco provided a method for a FoxPRo programmer (I am a very experienced
Foxpro programmer) to prevent their source from being decompiled by the Hilco
software... by putting this statement at the top of your FoxPro programs:
_REFOX_ = (9876543210)
And Fax.com did this. So you need the cooperation of Hilco to uncompile the
source, then you have the decryption key for the data.
Because Fax.com copied raw database files around, I am 99.999% certain they used
the same decryotion key on all their systems, including the master databases
running MS SQL Server 6.5.
Several years ago password used to be "comfax".
Then they changed it so that encryption will change on each upload. Only Eric
had the code and password.
Let's Stop The Fax Spammers In Their
Tracks!
To Report An Unsolicited Junk Fax
Please Fill Out The Form Below
THEN FAX US ALL
OF YOUR SPAM FAXES TO:
(754)
264-0166 AND GET PAID! |
We will investigate your fax spam report
at no charge to you and
we will work to track
down your fax spammer right away.
If we track down your fax spammer, we?ll
contact you ASAP and help you collect CASH MONEY!
Get $500 -
$1500 FOR
EVERY JUNK FAX YOU RECEIVE!!!
CHECK OUT OUR
NEWEST FAX SPAMMER BELOW
WHO IS IN OUR CROSS HAIRS FOR THIS MONTH!
|
One of the notorious fax spam
perpetrators is
First Select
Travel In Houston, Texas.
We have been told
that the owners name is Mike.
Check
Out First Select Travel & Mike on RipOff Report.com!
FAX US ALL Your
Junk
FAXES NOW TO OUR FAX NUMBER BELOW:
(754)
264-0166 AND
GET PAID IF
WE TRACK
YOUR FAX SPAMMER DOWN!
Background
Information About Junk Spam Faxes.
The TCPA and Federal Communications
Commission (FCC) rules generally prohibit most
unsolicited junk facsimile (fax spam)
advertisements. The TCPA states that an
advertiser cannot send you unsolicited fax
advertisements unless you have given the
advertiser your prior express consent to receive
fax advertisements or you have an established
business relationship (EBR). Even if the
advertiser has received your prior express
consent or has EBR, they are also required to
allow you to ?opt out? of receiving their
junk fax advertisements. The Junk Fax Prevention
Act of 2005, directed the FCC to amend its rules
adopted pursuant to the TCPA regarding fax
advertising. The FCC?s revised rules:
|
|
|
|
|
Require the
sender of fax advertisements to provide
specific information on the fax that
allows recipients to ?opt-out? of any
future faxes from the sender |
|
|
Specify the circumstances under
which a request to ?opt-out? complies
with the Act. |
|